For the week ending May 2, 2025
Welcome back to another edition of 🚦Signal & Noise—the only newsletter where the Fed teases rate cuts, Boomers take the heat, and the Mona Lisa still refuses to explain that smile.
This week, we’re living in the land of mixed signals and perfectly arched eyebrows—where the Fed is dropping hints like a moody teenager, fintech startups are quietly rewriting Wall Street’s source code, and Boomers are getting the roast they didn’t ask for (but probably deserve). Once again don’t @me, I am a Boomer. Leonardo's long gone, but the art of cryptic signaling lives on—in the form of Jerome Powell, who’s still squinting at economic data like it’s a half-finished fresco. Will rates fall? Will they stay put? The Fed isn’t saying much, but they’re definitely saying it slowly. Coincidence? Probably. But we’re leaning in anyway.
What’s Inside This Week?
A smirking tribute to da Vinci and the world’s most side-eyed portrait.
A plain-English breakdown of the Fed’s maybe/kinda/someday rate-cut dance.
A look at Alpaca, the fintech upstart giving legacy brokerages heartburn.
And a scorched-earth reflection on Boomers (the book and the people).
Let’s dive in—just don’t blink. The Mona Lisa never does.
Do me a favor: share 🚦Signal & Noise with a friend, a coworker, or that Boomer uncle who still thinks CDs are a great investment (and not the musical kind). If you’re enjoying this weekly swirl of sarcasm, market paranoia, and Mona Lisa side-eye, pull someone else into the chaos. Misery loves company—and so do newsletters.
Do you want to support 🚦Signal & Noise? Its only $100 a year or a paltry $9.99 per month. What a bargain for such entertaining wit!
ON THIS DAY: Leonardo da Vinci Dies. The Mona Lisa Keeps Smirking.
Leonardo da Vinci died on this day in 1519, leaving behind notebooks full of anatomical studies, flying machines, mirror writing, and one famously unfazed woman who hasn’t blinked in over 500 years.
That woman, of course, is La Gioconda—better known as the Mona Lisa. Yes, she’s smaller than you think. Yes, she has no eyebrows. And yes, she still pulls bigger crowds at the Louvre than the Venus de Milo, the Winged Victory of Samothrace, and Beyoncé combined.
Fun fact: Leonardo never delivered the painting to its buyer. He just carried it around like a Renaissance iPhone wallpaper he couldn’t stop tweaking. Napoleon slept next to it. The French gave it a throne. And the rest of the world went from “eh” to obsessed after it was stolen in 1911—and suddenly everyone realized they missed it.
Since then, she’s survived rocks, acid, coffee mugs, and one deeply unfortunate paperback thriller (The Da Vinci Code) that turned a masterpiece into a decoder ring for conspiracy buffs and midlife crises. Spoiler alert: there is no bloodline of Jesus hidden in her squint.
But what is hidden is genius: Leonardo’s sfumato technique created those soft shadows and that famously unreadable smile—a smile that seems to say, “I’ve been in Napoleon’s bedroom and your conspiracy novel is adorable.”
So today, we raise a glass to Leonardo: painter, inventor, anatomist, and, depending on your interpretation, the world’s first master of “leaving it on read.” The Mona Lisa isn’t just a portrait—it’s an eternal shrug in oil paint. And frankly, that’s art.
Rate Cuts, Headlines, and Hype: What the Fed's Tea Leaves Mean for Investors
You can barely open your inbox without seeing some breathless headline about rate cuts. One minute it's imminent pivot, the next it's hawkish hold. Welcome to Federal Reserve Watch 2025—America's least thrilling reality show with very real consequences. But behind the jargon and CNBC panel chatter is a serious shift taking shape: the Fed is warming up to the idea of rate cuts.
Let’s break it down like you don’t have a Bloomberg terminal glued to your forehead.
What's Going On With the Fed?
The Fed's been playing it close to the vest. Jerome Powell and his economic crew have dropped hints that rate cuts might be on the menu soon—assuming inflation keeps calming down and the economy doesn’t suddenly veer into a ditch. Some Fed members are chirping publicly, others are mumbling cautiously. Either way, Wall Street is reading every comma and semicolon in those speeches like they hold the nuclear codes.
So far, inflation is trending in the right direction. Jobs are holding up—sort of. And the consumer? Still swiping that card, though starting to show signs of fatigue. Put simply: the economy isn’t booming, but it’s not breaking either. Which means the Fed has some room to ease up.
Globally, other central banks have already hit the brakes. That puts pressure on the Fed to follow suit or risk the dollar getting too strong and making U.S. goods more expensive abroad. And yes, somewhere in this story is China and oil prices and a whole geopolitical mess, but let’s not overcomplicate it. The Fed is watching the world, but its focus is domestic.
What Happens If They Actually Cut?
Cutting rates makes borrowing cheaper. Businesses borrow to expand. Consumers borrow to buy. The gears of capitalism turn a little smoother. Sectors like tech, real estate, and manufacturing tend to pop when money loosens up.
Small businesses and startups? They breathe a sigh of relief. Cheaper loans mean more room to invest, hire, and maybe even pay back their pandemic-era debts. The Fed cuts, and suddenly, things don’t feel so tight.
Higher rates have turned the housing market into a stalled parade float. If cuts come, expect more movement: mortgage rates could dip, sidelined buyers might return, and refinancing could come back into vogue. Contractors and builders get busy again. Home equity gets a little less... theoretical.
Here’s the tightrope walk: cut too soon or too fast, and inflation could boomerang. The Fed knows this. That’s why Powell looks like he hasn’t slept since 2022. Rate cuts could stimulate growth, yes, but they could also reheat prices. This isn't a free lunch. It's a bet.
Markets: Already Buzzing
Investors Are Pricing It In
Markets have already decided that cuts are coming. Fed funds futures scream it. Bond yields whisper it. Everyone from Wall Street traders to TikTok finance bros are positioning themselves for a softer Fed.
The danger? If the Fed says, "Not yet," markets could throw a tantrum. Volatility spikes. Algorithms freak out. This is the gap between expectation and reality. Investors should tread accordingly.
Historically, rate cuts are like catnip for equities. Growth sectors (hello, tech and consumer discretionary) tend to rip higher. Financials are trickier—they make less on lending spreads but gain from lower default risk and more loan activity.
Safe sectors like utilities and staples? They may lag as money moves toward "risk on." This is the rotation dance. Sometimes elegant, sometimes ugly. But always worth watching.
Bondholders are smiling. Yields are sliding as expectations for rate cuts grow. That means prices are rising. Longer-duration bonds in particular are catching a bid.
Corporate bonds may see spreads narrow as default fears fade. Munis and MBS have their own quirks, but in general, falling rates = good news for fixed income portfolios that don’t look like they were assembled in 1983.
What This Means for Advisors - Is It Time to Tune Portfolios?
If you're a proponent of global asset allocation and use factor-based modeling in your portfolio strategy, your approach likely won’t change much. You’re investing through capital markets, not crystal balls. Diversification, long-term exposure, and disciplined rebalancing still carry the day, regardless of where the Fed dots land.
But if you're an active portfolio manager? Different story. Now you're juggling rate sensitivity, sector tilts, style rotations, and macro predictions. You’re not just adjusting; you’re pulling levers on a moving train. It can work—but it adds layers of complexity. Personally, I don’t favor that methodology. I’m not an advisor, but my take is this: proceed with caution. When you position portfolios based on a forecast, you're also shaping expectations—and that’s a game with serious downside if you’re wrong. It’s not about betting on the Fed. It’s about being ready either way.
Talk to Clients (Not Just Their Portfolios)
When rate cuts dominate headlines, clients have questions—some informed, others YouTube-inspired. Advisors need to explain what it means for them: mortgages, cash flow, investments, retirement income.
Set expectations. Stay realistic. Remind people that rate changes ripple, not detonate.
Lower rates mean new chances to refinance, adjust debt, rethink savings yields, and reevaluate annuity and insurance assumptions. Planning conversations should zoom out beyond this quarter’s Fed decision and re-center on long-term goals.
What Else?
Refinance opportunities. Lower credit card APRs. More attractive auto loans. These are real-world wins. Everyday households may get some breathing room if rate cuts roll out.
Falling rates make generating safe income harder. CDs, treasuries, high-yield savings? They all sag. That means retirees will likely have to get creative or take on more risk to hit the same income targets.
If you’ve been waiting to buy a home, a Fed cut might help. But beware: if rates drop, demand can spike and prices might jump too. Don’t just chase the rate—run the math.
Savings accounts and money markets have been throwing off decent yields. That could change. Rate cuts usually mean falling interest on cash. It’s time to rethink how you manage idle money.
One More Thing: The Psychology
Markets and people react to Fed moves long before anything actually changes. Why? Because economics is part math, part mood. The moment Powell hints, everyone gets twitchy.
That’s why advisors matter. That’s why planning matters. Because rate cuts aren’t just about money. They’re about behavior. And right now, behavior is bouncing between FOMO and fear of getting burned.
Bottom Line
The Fed might cut rates soon. Or not. But the trend line is clear: policy is shifting, and the markets are already moving. This isn’t about guessing the next press conference. It’s about understanding what comes after.
If you’re an advisor, a retiree, or just someone trying to buy a house or avoid a 24% APR, rate cuts matter. But not in isolation. Put them in the context of your goals, your time horizon, and your tolerance for risk.
As always: block out the noise. Follow the signal.
Do you know people who insist they like 'all kinds of music'? That actually means they like no kinds of music."
— Chuck Klosterman, Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa Puffs
Alpaca: The Fintech Upstart Giving Wall Street a Migraine
You’ve heard of Robinhood. You’ve tolerated Schwab. Now meet Alpaca—a name that sounds like a hiking boot brand but is actually one of the fastest-growing brokerage tech firms around.
Founded in 2015 by software engineers Yoshi Yokokawa and Hitoshi Harada, Alpaca launched with one clean idea: give developers the power to plug trading into any app with a few lines of code. No bloated platforms. No legacy bloatware. Just sleek infrastructure designed for a world where finance lives behind the screen.
And it’s working. In April 2025, Alpaca raised $52 million in Series C funding to fuel its global expansion and beef up its all-in-one, self-clearing brokerage engine. Translation? They’re not just playing with the big boys—they’re quietly rewriting the rulebook.
What Is Alpaca, Exactly?
Alpaca is a U.S.-based brokerage firm regulated by the SEC and FINRA. But unlike the traditional players who wrap their services in flag-waving ads and retirement clichés, Alpaca works behind the curtain.
Its product isn’t a slick app—it’s plumbing. Invisible digital infrastructure (APIs) that let developers build trading directly into their own apps, sites, or robo-advisors.
It supports U.S. stocks, ETFs, options, and crypto. It also clears its own trades, skipping outside firms and cutting down on costs, friction, and failure points.
What Makes It Different (and Why You Should Care)
Alpaca’s developer-first model means it’s not retrofitting old tech—it’s designed to integrate cleanly, scale easily, and support everything from basic account opening to real-time trading and market data.
This is the ace card. Most brokerages outsource clearing. Alpaca runs its own clearing engine, giving it more control, speed, and cost efficiency. It’s like building your own kitchen instead of ordering takeout every night.
No Commissions, No Gimmicks
Trading U.S. stocks and ETFs? Commission-free. No inactivity fees. Margin rates are competitive. Users get access without fine print gymnastics.
Going Global
That $52M haul is already being put to work: Alpaca is expanding into Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, locking down licenses and partnerships so developers can offer localized investing experiences without cobbling together three different custodians.
Security With Teeth
Alpaca’s security architecture includes Zero Trust frameworks, GDPR and UK data compliance, regular audits, and SIPC protection for U.S. securities. It's fintech-grade security, not a checkbox exercise.
Quick Breakdown: Alpaca vs. the Old Guard
Alpaca, representing the modern brokerage model, stands in stark contrast to traditional financial firms. Built on a cloud-native, API-first tech stack, Alpaca is designed for seamless integration and developer-friendliness—an area where legacy firms still rely on patchwork code and clunky systems.
Costs are significantly lower with Alpaca due to the absence of middlemen and bureaucratic layers, whereas traditional firms often carry high fees buried in complex structures.
In terms of speed, Alpaca operates in real time, leaving behind the batch-based processes still common in older systems. Product flexibility is also a major differentiator: Alpaca supports innovations like fractional shares and automation, while traditional firms tend to offer manual, limited options.
Finally, while most traditional firms remain largely U.S.-centric, Alpaca is quickly expanding its global reach, aiming to serve a broader and more dynamic market.
If Wall Street is still faxing, Alpaca’s already building in the cloud.
The Fine Print: What to Watch For
Even sleek fintech has its edges. Here’s where Alpaca still needs polish:
Limited Product Scope: No international equities yet. Fixed income remains off the menu.
Support Could Be Better: Don’t expect phone reps—support is via email and community forums.
Basic Funding Options: ACH and wires only. No Venmo, no crypto on-ramps.
Tech Risk: If you’re building on Alpaca, your product inherits its backend. Hope your devs are ready.
Crypto ≠ SIPC: Securities accounts are insured. Bitcoin? That’s your own business.
Why This Matters for Financial Advisors
Advisors usually get stuck with two lousy options:
Enterprise tools that cost a fortune and require an onboarding priesthood.
DIY hacks held together by Zapier and prayer.
Alpaca offers a third path: infrastructure that lets independent advisors launch digital investing tools without a hedge fund budget.
With Alpaca, advisors can:
Launch modern, digital investing platforms without custom engineering
Serve smaller clients using fractional shares
Offer automated portfolios and IRAs with less overhead
Speed up onboarding through digital KYC integrations
Stay compliant while keeping costs lean
Advisors who want to modernize—without losing their shirts—finally have a toolset that speaks their language (and doesn’t crash their browser).
The Takeaway
Alpaca isn’t just another fintech “disruptor.” It’s a signal that the very architecture of brokerage is being redefined. It’s faster. It’s leaner. It’s not waiting around for Goldman to catch up.
Self-clearing. API-driven. Global-ready. It’s finance for the post-app store era.
If you’re an advisor, a developer, or anyone building in this space, Alpaca might be the platform that helps you move faster, spend less, and serve more.
As for the old guard? Well—maybe it’s time they Google “how to integrate an API.”
Sorry Fellow Boomers, She Got Us
My take on Helen Andrews Book: Boomers
A Sharp Stick in the Eye of a Generation That Brought You Costco and Crisis or my personal comments on a book I read over the last few days
Helen Andrews’ Boomers is a literary Molotov cocktail hurled into the Whole Foods parking lot of modernist consumerism. It’s caustic, surgical, and—for those of us born at the ragged edge of 1964—a bit like hearing someone finally say out loud what we’ve been muttering into an AARP magazine.
Andrews doesn’t rant. She profiles. Six Boomers: Steve Jobs, Aaron Sorkin, Jeffrey Sachs, Camille Paglia, Al Sharpton, and Sonia Sotomayor. A motley crew of icons and irritants, each used to showcase one of the generation’s defining traits: narcissism disguised as vision, moral posturing wrapped in consumer-grade rebellion, ambition with the brakes cut, and good old-fashioned bullying.
The standout (for me) is the Al Sharpton chapter, where Andrews delivers a brutal distinction: transformational vs. transactional Boomerism. Translation? One sells you the dream; the other invoices you monthly for it. Sharpton, in her telling, is the perfect avatar of Boomer grift—always ready to march, but only after checking with accounting.
As a Boomer myself, I read this book with a mix of grim nodding and existential nausea. She’s not wrong. Many Boomers have torched the place, then complained about the price of the firewood. Their idea of legacy is a Facebook post, a brokerage account, and a spring vacation with airport lounge access.
Andrews also skewers the delicious irony: Millennials, despite their TikTok-fueled takedowns of Boomers, are following eerily similar tracks. They’re just doing it with better filters and, in some cases, inherited money. (Full disclosure: I love Millennials. I trust them more than I trust anyone who still uses AOL.)
Which brings us to the obvious truth: All politicians are Boomers now. Even the Millennial ones. Same uncut narcissism. Same addiction to hollow branding. Whether they’re wearing Vans or cowboy boots, it’s all the same tired choreography: pose like a revolutionary, worship at the dull altar of identity politics.
Now contrast this with Bruce Cannon Gibney’s A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America, which I’m currently reading. I’m only three chapters in, but so far, he’s more accusatory than analytical—same conclusion as Andrews, just with more volume and less elegance. The irony? Gibney made his fortune investing in Silicon Valley, which is basically Boomer ego converted into cloud-based services. A little self-awareness wouldn’t hurt. In fairness, I’m not finished yet.
Verdict: Boomers is funny, brutal, and intellectually satisfying. Required reading for anyone born before 1980—and especially those of us who remember when “networking” meant bad coffee, stale bagels, and a business card that listed “fax.” Sorry, fellow Boomers. She nailed us.
That’s a Wrap
Leonardo’s dead, the Fed’s undecided, Wall Street’s APIs are shedding their training wheels, and Boomers—well, they’re still Boomering.
Whether you’re bracing for rate cuts, plotting your API-powered takeover of legacy finance, or just squinting at the Mona Lisa wondering what she knows that we don’t—remember: markets move, headlines scream, and generational cringe is forever.
Until next week, keep your smile mysterious and your investment strategy even more so. Enjoy your weekend. Go for a long walk.
Cheers,
Lawain
P.S. Once again, a gentle reminder: say your daily prayers and stay positive.
Copyright, Disclosure, and Disclaimer Statement
© 2025, Mission Surrender, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
🚦Signal & Noise is the intellectual property of Mission Surrender, LLC. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of the author, except in the case of brief quotations used in reviews, academic citations, or personal reference.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any organization, institution, or entity. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented is accurate, well-sourced, and properly attributed. However, if any misstatements, misquotes, or missing attributions are identified, please notify the author, and corrections will be made accordingly. Some articles is curated from multiple sources, and any omission of references is unintentional. The content is intended for informational and discussion purposes only and should not be construed as professional, financial, legal, or theological advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult appropriate experts before making decisions based on the material provided. By reading this article, you acknowledge that the author and publisher are not responsible for any inaccuracies, interpretations, or consequences that may arise from the use of this content.
This material is intended for informational and educational purposes only. Personal use is permitted; however, commercial use (such as repackaging, reselling, or incorporating this content into paid products, courses, coaching programs, or publications) is strictly prohibited without explicit written consent. Licensing options are available for organizations, publishers, or businesses that wish to distribute or adapt these materials. Please contact lawain@lawainmcneil.com for licensing inquiries.